A released clip from the movie, depicting the alleged ordeal she recently underwent at a lodge, has left many Zimbabweans "dumbfounded."

The film is presented as a collaboration between Mai Jeremaya and Naiza Boom, aiming to share her recent story, specifically portraying what allegedly transpired between her and the two men she had accused of assault.

Mai Jeremaya Takes Center Stage in New Production

In the "Pa Lodge" movie, Mai Jeremaya takes on a central role, working with one of Zimbabwe's prominent production companies. The narrative within the film reportedly begins with Mai Jeremaya detailing her struggles, particularly concerning her children, which ultimately led her to the lodge where the alleged events took place.

The socialite had previously come forward publicly, alleging that two men assaulted her in Eastlea. The matter subsequently proceeded to court, where, following a trial, the two men were acquitted. The judge's ruling cited inconsistencies in the narration of events and insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. The movie appears to offer Mai Jeremaya's perspective on these events.

Mai Jeremaya's "Pa Lodge" Movie

Other actors are featured in the movie, taking on the roles of the two accused men, Martin and Thabo, as the story unfolds from Mai Jeremaya's point of view. A clip from the movie shared on social media by @DandaroOnline drew immediate attention:

#dandarostreets Check out Mai Jeremaya’s new movie produced by Naiza Boom, its titled “Pa Lodge”…🙌🏾💯✔️

Public Reaction: Confusion, Criticism, and Questions About Advice

The release of the "Pa Lodge" movie has been met with a distinctly mixed and often critical reaction from netizens across Zimbabwe. Many have openly questioned the advisability of Mai Jeremaya’s decision to dramatize her highly publicized and recently concluded court case, with some suggesting she may be "losing control of her narrative" or receiving "bad advisors."

Comments circulating on social media reflect widespread confusion and concern:

• @Dr Paul Jira remarked, "After previously describing the experience as traumatic, the individual now chooses to publicly relive it through cinematography. Speaking for myself and, I believe, for many others .. I find this quite confusing and difficult to understand."
• @Jamal JRab bluntly stated, "That's in very bad taste. She has bad advisors."
• @Shaun Matienga questioned the entire production, asking for clarity from the creative team: "Need a discussion with the scriptwriter, the actors, the cameraman, the video editor, the director….the whole crew. What was this for?"

While a segment of the public has reportedly applauded her for choosing to tell her story on her own terms, the prevailing sentiment appears to be one of bewilderment and concern regarding the appropriateness of publicly dramatizing such a sensitive personal and legal matter, particularly after a court acquittal.

The movie's release reignites discussions surrounding Mai Jeremaya's public image, her choices in managing personal narratives, and the ethics of content creation around highly sensitive legal cases involving public figures.