Prophet Evidence Chari of Grace Family International Church has sparked controversy with his threats to hack the H-Metro website in response to the coverage of an incident at his service labeled ‘Recond Breaking Friday.’
The altercation arose following a dispute over a vehicle between Prophetess Hadassah and Prophet Chari, escalating into violence and resulting in a series of contentious exchanges.
In a Facebook post, Prophet Chari accused Prophetess Hadassah and her team of being 'refugees' whom he accommodated in his mansion for five months due to their refusal to reside in their modest one-room dwelling lacking suitable furnishings.
Subsequently, Prophet Chari visited the H-Metro newsroom, insisting on confronting the journalist responsible for the coverage and issuing unspecified threats regarding the publication of video footage depicting the altercation at his church.
Expressing discontent with the coverage, Prophet Chari voiced his intention to address the issue through his social media platforms, signaling a stance against what he perceived as unjust media portrayal.
However, the public response to the incident has been divided, with some individuals criticizing Prophet Chari for his actions, particularly in relation to an alleged assault on his wife, identified as Anesu, as depicted in the video footage shared by H-Metro.
His intention to seek retribution and scrutiny of media practices have ignited discussions regarding the ethical responsibilities of both the press and public figures, shedding light on the complexities of media coverage within the context of religious and societal dynamics.
The tussle between Prophet Chari and H-Metro marks a significant juncture in how conflicts between public figures and media outlets can unravel, highlighting the critical need for constructive engagement, transparency, and ethical conduct in both reporting and public responses to contentious events.
As this situation continues to unfold, the broader implications of responsible media coverage and the ethical conduct of public figures in the public domain remain crucial focal points for scrutiny and reflection.
In a Facebook post, Prophet Chari accused Prophetess Hadassah and her team of being 'refugees' whom he accommodated in his mansion for five months due to their refusal to reside in their modest one-room dwelling lacking suitable furnishings.
Subsequently, Prophet Chari visited the H-Metro newsroom, insisting on confronting the journalist responsible for the coverage and issuing unspecified threats regarding the publication of video footage depicting the altercation at his church.
 |
| Prophet Evidence Chari Threatens H-Metro Website Hack Over Coverage Dispute |
However, the public response to the incident has been divided, with some individuals criticizing Prophet Chari for his actions, particularly in relation to an alleged assault on his wife, identified as Anesu, as depicted in the video footage shared by H-Metro.
His intention to seek retribution and scrutiny of media practices have ignited discussions regarding the ethical responsibilities of both the press and public figures, shedding light on the complexities of media coverage within the context of religious and societal dynamics.
The tussle between Prophet Chari and H-Metro marks a significant juncture in how conflicts between public figures and media outlets can unravel, highlighting the critical need for constructive engagement, transparency, and ethical conduct in both reporting and public responses to contentious events.
As this situation continues to unfold, the broader implications of responsible media coverage and the ethical conduct of public figures in the public domain remain crucial focal points for scrutiny and reflection.
.jpg "Sona Solar Zimbabwe")
.jpg "Sona Solar Zimbabwe")
